Download pianoteq
Author: a | 2025-04-23
Pianoteq 7.5.4 (Bản chuẩn cuối) - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.3 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.1 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.3.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.2.1
Modartt Pianoteq Harpsichord for Pianoteq Download
(films, video games, anime, etc.). But it's good to see that some people think otherwise Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478I also find 60 a bit much but 70 and 80 are good. I actually like it at 70.I wish I could get rid of the ringing my ears hear. It's so bad with pianoteq it takes all the enjoyment out of playing.I hear it with other VST's, but nowhere near as much as with Pianoteq.RonKawai CA79VSL (BÖSENDORFER 280VC, CFX, Steinway D-274), Modern U, Ravenscroft275, Noire, Lounge Lizard EP-4(Not Used much) Garritan Abbey Road Studios CFX, Bechstein Digital, , Auddict_Dorian_Marko, The Grandeur,, 300_Grand_Compact, Pianoteq, Synthology_American_DJoined: Dec 2021Posts: 303Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Dec 2021Posts: 303I'm the person who made that statement, and I don't think it's BS. I said that after having played Pianoteq and Garritan CFX side by side. Pianoteq simply felt better to play. I prefer to play it. Does it actually sound better? I don't know, pretty sure if I just play a single key on each the Garritan CFX note sounds better, more natural. Why then, do I prefer to play Pianoteq? Maybe it's just the playability, and I prefer Pianoteq even though it sounds worse. But that's certainly not the way my mind works. Pianoteq feels better to play, so it sounds better while you're playing.Doesn't matter if it is BS, though. The Pianoteq demo is free and nearly fully functional, and a quick and simple install. Anybody who cares to try can demo them side by side and decide for themselves.Wasn’t directing my comments at you specifically, just my disagreement with the general sentiment (which I’ve seen expressed numerous times over the years) that Pianoteq is somehow more “alive” in comparison with sample-based instruments. Pianoteq was actually the first external VST I purchased based largely on such claims, and I was more or less happy with it until I had a chance to try a top level sampled VST, at which point I realized just how misleading many of the claims made about sample-based instruments by Pianoteq advocates were. Not only was the sampled piano just as capable of expressive and nuanced playing as Pianoteq, it also sounded way more tangible and real, which for me translated into a much more involving overall playing experience. After that there was no going back.I still keep up with Pianoteq and dutifully download each new version to see if they’ve finally been able to close the gap, but so far none of the updates they’ve made over the past few years has changed my overall opinion.In any case, I agree that everyone should feel free to try the demo out and come to their own conclusions, You are not logged in. Please login or register. Pages 1 You must login or register to post a reply 1 20-02-2025 10:24 vertumno Member Offline Registered: 20-02-2025 Posts: 2 Topic: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? Hello everyone,I'm testing the trial version of Pianoteq (stage and standard) I find really good and inspiring.I have a question about overtones, in a YouTube video I saw a user with the Pro version playing overtones (always a problem in sampled pianos)However when I tried to play overtones on my trial version only the 1st and octave overtones would be really heard.I.e. if I play C4 muted, I can make resonate the other strings only playing C3 and C5, C6...If I play E3 for example to make the sympathetic C strings resonate I can hardly hear anything if at all.So are overtones different across section of Pianoteq?Also in said video the user was able to bring the velocity down to zero thus playing only the overtones, without the fundamental, I wasn't able to replicate that too on my trial version...Any idea of what's going on?Many thanks 2 Reply by brundlefly 27-02-2025 01:25 brundlefly Member Offline Registered: 31-03-2022 Posts: 212 Re: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? Yes, Pianoteq produces the full complexity of resonances in a piano, including string, duplex string and case resonances, and not just octaves. I suspect what you were seeing was a demonstration of Pianoteq being used as resonance FX for another instrument in which case you would send the MIDI to both the main instrument and Pianoteq but pull the velocity curve down to zero so that Pianoteq resonates based the audio input from the main instrument and which dampers are raised (per the MIDI input) without its strings being directly hammered.I'm not sure right offhand whether the demo can be used as a resonance FX and I suspect you need at least Pianoteq Standard to get it, but all verisons should have the basic resonance response for all the internal sounds; you just don't have as much control over them in Stage. 3 Reply by vertumno 03-03-2025 14:48 vertumno Member Offline Registered: 20-02-2025 Posts: 2 Re: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? brundlefly wrote:Yes, Pianoteq produces the full complexity of resonances in a piano, including string, duplex string and case resonances, and not just octaves. I suspect what you were seeing was a demonstration of Pianoteq beingPianoteq versions comparison table: PIANOTEQ PIANOTEQ
About Pianoteq for Mac Pianoteq for Mac is an award-winning virtual instrument that you can install on your computer (PC/Mac). It can be used both in standalone mode and as an instrument plug-in in VST, AAX, and AudioUnits hosts.What makes the app superior to other virtual instruments is that the instruments are physically modeled and thus can simulate the playability and complex behavior of real acoustic instruments. By omitting the usage of samples, the file size is just a tiny fraction of that offered by other virtual instruments, perfect for use on any modern laptop.Version 6 of the app brings numerous refinements in its engine and physical model, increasing realism and acoustic presence on all its instruments: acoustic pianos, electro-acoustic pianos, histor... Read More » Why choose FileHorse?SecureSecurely download files from our super-fast and secure dedicated linux serversSafeThis product is 100% safe has been successfully scanned with more than 60 antivirus programsTrustedWe serve all files as they were released. We do not use bundlers or download-managers. Pianoteq 7.5.4 (Bản chuẩn cuối) - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.3 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.1 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.3.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.2.1Pianoteq 4.1 Download - Pianoteq 4.exe
Be permitted, that if Garritan CFX Lite is like silk, and the FP-30 is like cotton, then Pianoteq is like sawdust.In its defence, I am battling an annoying case of sinusitis right now, so maybe this has in some way affected my sense of sound. i certainly don't remember Pianoteq sounding offending before.Physical instruments: Roland FP-30, and E-28Virtual instruments: "The Experience" piano collection, NI "The Maverick", Galaxy II Grand piano collection, Synthogy Ivory II Studio Grands, Production Voices Estate Grand, Garritan CFX Lite, Pianoteq 7.5.2Focus: 1850±100 yearsJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,43910K Post Club Member10K Post Club MemberJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,439If your sinusitis somehow causes Pianoteq to sound like sawdust, why would it allow the Garritan to sound like silk?It seems to me that it's not the sinusitis. Rather, the Garritan is showing your ears what a piano sounds like, and you've become blissfully accustomed to that.Joined: May 2018Posts: 1,9671000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: May 2018Posts: 1,967If your sinusitis somehow causes Pianoteq to sound like sawdust, why would it allow the Garritan to sound like silk?It seems to me that it's not the sinusitis. Rather, the Garritan is showing your ears what a piano sounds like, and you've become blissfully accustomed to that.In fairness, I have not listened to the Garritan since the sinusitis began. But that is probably besides the point, the more surprising discovery is prefering the Roland's own Steinway sample over all the Pianoteq instruments.My gut tells me that Pianoteq's reverb is central to its shortcomings (although not the only cause for the harshness).Physical instruments: Roland FP-30, and E-28Virtual instruments: "The Experience" piano collection, NI "The Maverick", Galaxy II Grand piano collection, Synthogy Ivory II Studio Grands, Production Voices Estate Grand, Garritan CFX Lite, Pianoteq 7.5.2Focus: 1850±100 yearsJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,43910K Post Club Member10K Post Club MemberJoined: You from getting the NV10S.Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478I will admit, I never use Pianoteq, but I have no problem with the sound. It just not what I am looking for.It is a digitize sound and in my view not meant to sound like a real piano.If that is the type of sound you enjoy, it is very well done.The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.People seem quick to bash Pianoteq like it was a virus that needs to be squashed.Both types of sound can co-exist.RonKawai CA79VSL (BÖSENDORFER 280VC, CFX, Steinway D-274), Modern U, Ravenscroft275, Noire, Lounge Lizard EP-4(Not Used much) Garritan Abbey Road Studios CFX, Bechstein Digital, , Auddict_Dorian_Marko, The Grandeur,, 300_Grand_Compact, Pianoteq, Synthology_American_DJoined: Jun 2013Posts: 5,7515000 Post Club Member5000 Post Club MemberJoined: Jun 2013Posts: 5,751The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.Surely, this is in your humble opinion; for you see, I have a different yet humble opinion on “The Rolands;” and one could argue that my humble opinion is more-widely held than your “lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.”Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.Surely, this is in your humble opinion; for you see, I have a different yet humblePianoteq 5.3 Download - Pianoteq 4.exe
Of “living” or “organic” quality in comparison to sampled pianos which sound “dead.” Phil Best regularly makes these kinds of claims in his videos. After several years playing both Pianoteq and top quality sampled pianos, I have to say that I’ve never found this to be the case. Yes the playability on Pianoteq is excellent, but there is no magic “living” quality that I can discern, and a well engineered sampled piano is just as (if not more) capable of producing a natural organic quality. In fact, the most natural playing and sounding virtual piano I know of is the VSL Bluthner, while feels more like a living, breathing instrument under my fingers than any modeled piano I’ve tried. The vintage tone may not be to everyone’s taste, or suitable for all repertoire, but in terms of creating an authentic and alive playing experience, it’s absolute tops in my book.Okay, I’m going to retreat to my bunker now to avoid the incoming bombs. 🫣Joined: Nov 2018Posts: 1,8301000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: Nov 2018Posts: 1,830Quite a few people seem to be claiming there are no differences between Pianoteq 7 and Pianoteq 8. I've had a chance to A/B test multiple pianos and there are most definitely some nice improvements. I feel it as improved vibrancy and sparkle. Nice changes in the bass as well, in my opinion.This is an easy comparison between the Ant. Petrof on Pianoteq 7.5.4 vs Pianoteq 8. You can compare the entire recording or jump directly to the deep-linked times to compare some more obvious differences.7.5.4 @ 1 minute 10 second mark: 8.0.0 @ 1 minute 10 second mark: I'm enjoying Pianoteq 8 very much!Joined: Sep 2020Posts: 111Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Sep 2020Posts: 111Thank you for posting those videos, Navindra! I was looking forward to hearing new recordings from you on Pianoteq 8, so it was great to hear your impressions. Thanks for showcasing how the tone is improved - that really did bring a lot of clarity. I loved your performance of Last Dance... it actually inspired me to go and practice that piece myself. Happy Post-Thanksgiving!Last edited by Tozen; 11/25/22 03:49 PM.Joined: Nov 2018Posts: 1,8301000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: Nov 2018Posts: 1,830Thank you for posting those videos, Navindra! I was looking forward to hearing new recordings from you on Pianoteq 8, so it was great to hear your impressions. Thanks for showcasing how the tone is improved - that really did bring a lot of clarity. I loved your performance of Last Dance... it actually inspired me to go and practice that piece myself. Happy Post-Thanksgiving!Thank you! That's great to hear. I've always felt like this piece was somewhat under-appreciated. I agreePianoteq 5.0 Download - Pianoteq 4.exe
Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound fore wrote:when I played my dp, the keys would go up and down in the the programs interface, but no sound going thru the laptop.That should be fairly simple to correct.Click on the Options button in upper right side of interface.You should see AUDIO DEVICE TYPE: with a selection menu.Click on it and select WINDOWS AUDIO.That should send the output through your computer speakers. 5 Reply by fore 02-02-2014 17:30 fore Member Offline Registered: 02-02-2014 Posts: 7 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound I'm using a macbook pro, and I have 'built in output' under Output, and 'output 1 and output 2' selected in Active Output Channel. 6 Reply by custral 02-02-2014 17:31 custral Member Offline Registered: 22-08-2010 Posts: 288 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound Sometimes, it needs that I quit the ASIO4ALL control panel before right function occurs. It's instant. 7 Reply by fore 02-02-2014 17:39 fore Member Offline Registered: 02-02-2014 Posts: 7 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound oh well, i might just give up on this. too aggravating. 8 Reply by mabry 03-02-2014 00:02 mabry Member Offline Registered: 25-02-2010 Posts: 118 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound fore wrote:oh well, i might just give up on this. too aggravating.This is understandable but please be aware that it is not Pianoteq that is at fault, these types of problems arise due to the complexity of creating audio on PCs; be glad you have a Mac, Windows is probably even more difficult to work with. 9 Reply by fore 03-02-2014 00:48 fore Member Offline Registered: 02-02-2014 Posts: 7 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound mabry wrote:fore wrote:oh well, i might just give up on this. too aggravating.This is understandable but please be aware that it is not Pianoteq that is at fault, these types of problems arise due to the complexity of creating audio on PCs; be glad you have a Mac, Windows is probably even more difficult to work with.I hope you're right. I've tried every configuration with no luck. And so strange, it worked perfectly with the exact same hookup and settings. Missed it today while practicing If anyone has an idea, feel free...Edit: Another forum made a suggestion, turning down the vol on my 105. Worked! I had no idea the vol was supposed to be turned down at all. I feel pretty dumb Anyway, the quirky thing is there's a ping sound with every key played. I have no special effects turned on. Last edited by fore (03-02-2014 01:24) 10 Reply by fore 03-02-2014 17:55 fore Member Offline Registered: 02-02-2014 Posts: 7 Re: Pianoteq not playing piano sound Listening more carefully last night, the ping is w. releasing. Pianoteq 7.5.4 (Bản chuẩn cuối) - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.3 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.1 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.3.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.2.1 Pianoteq 7.5.4 (Bản chuẩn cuối) - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.3 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.1 - Download; Pianoteq 7.5.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.4.0 - Download; Pianoteq 7.3.2 - Download; Pianoteq 7.2.1Pianoteq 4.2 Download - Pianoteq 4.exe
Welcome to the Piano World Piano ForumsOver 3 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments. Over 100,000 members from around the world.Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers (it's free)It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!SEARCHPiano Forums & Piano World Who's Online Now8 members (AlkansBookcase, David B, notusedihope, salce, Qberticus, 3 invisible),1,082guests, and 197robots.Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod Joined: Aug 2017Posts: 1,6781000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: Aug 2017Posts: 1,678Wow it’s a substancial update from version 6 i must say. Better attack and even better decay , althaugh i could swear there was still a bit synthi character in the two octaves above A440.And the bass is less muddy too.Great job, .... getting better each version althaugh going back and forth i still prefer VSL, Garritan and Embertone by some margin.Ha ha.. that is very likely the actual review will be when Pianoteq 7 is actually released!OshoMason & Hamlin BBKawai Novus NV10 + VST + Genelec 8050B monitors.Current VST favorites (in the order of preference): Pianoteq 7/VSL Synchron Concert D//Garritan CFX/Embertone Walker D FullJoined: May 2018Posts: 1,9671000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: May 2018Posts: 1,967I've been away from Pianoteq for a few months after getting Garritan CFX Lite. Actually, I have been playing with the FP-30's own sound mostly this year due to impatience with respect to firing up a PC, and launching the Garritan CFX, or Pianoteq, software.But for the Adult Beginners Forum's recital I want to record using Pianoteq (it automatically records every note you play), so therefore I launched Pianoteq yesterday.And, OMG, it sounded harsh to my ears now - no matter how I changed parameter settings around, it just sounded in-your-face vulgar and rude. I would say based on this, if an analogy willComments
(films, video games, anime, etc.). But it's good to see that some people think otherwise Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478I also find 60 a bit much but 70 and 80 are good. I actually like it at 70.I wish I could get rid of the ringing my ears hear. It's so bad with pianoteq it takes all the enjoyment out of playing.I hear it with other VST's, but nowhere near as much as with Pianoteq.RonKawai CA79VSL (BÖSENDORFER 280VC, CFX, Steinway D-274), Modern U, Ravenscroft275, Noire, Lounge Lizard EP-4(Not Used much) Garritan Abbey Road Studios CFX, Bechstein Digital, , Auddict_Dorian_Marko, The Grandeur,, 300_Grand_Compact, Pianoteq, Synthology_American_DJoined: Dec 2021Posts: 303Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Dec 2021Posts: 303I'm the person who made that statement, and I don't think it's BS. I said that after having played Pianoteq and Garritan CFX side by side. Pianoteq simply felt better to play. I prefer to play it. Does it actually sound better? I don't know, pretty sure if I just play a single key on each the Garritan CFX note sounds better, more natural. Why then, do I prefer to play Pianoteq? Maybe it's just the playability, and I prefer Pianoteq even though it sounds worse. But that's certainly not the way my mind works. Pianoteq feels better to play, so it sounds better while you're playing.Doesn't matter if it is BS, though. The Pianoteq demo is free and nearly fully functional, and a quick and simple install. Anybody who cares to try can demo them side by side and decide for themselves.Wasn’t directing my comments at you specifically, just my disagreement with the general sentiment (which I’ve seen expressed numerous times over the years) that Pianoteq is somehow more “alive” in comparison with sample-based instruments. Pianoteq was actually the first external VST I purchased based largely on such claims, and I was more or less happy with it until I had a chance to try a top level sampled VST, at which point I realized just how misleading many of the claims made about sample-based instruments by Pianoteq advocates were. Not only was the sampled piano just as capable of expressive and nuanced playing as Pianoteq, it also sounded way more tangible and real, which for me translated into a much more involving overall playing experience. After that there was no going back.I still keep up with Pianoteq and dutifully download each new version to see if they’ve finally been able to close the gap, but so far none of the updates they’ve made over the past few years has changed my overall opinion.In any case, I agree that everyone should feel free to try the demo out and come to their own conclusions,
2025-04-21You are not logged in. Please login or register. Pages 1 You must login or register to post a reply 1 20-02-2025 10:24 vertumno Member Offline Registered: 20-02-2025 Posts: 2 Topic: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? Hello everyone,I'm testing the trial version of Pianoteq (stage and standard) I find really good and inspiring.I have a question about overtones, in a YouTube video I saw a user with the Pro version playing overtones (always a problem in sampled pianos)However when I tried to play overtones on my trial version only the 1st and octave overtones would be really heard.I.e. if I play C4 muted, I can make resonate the other strings only playing C3 and C5, C6...If I play E3 for example to make the sympathetic C strings resonate I can hardly hear anything if at all.So are overtones different across section of Pianoteq?Also in said video the user was able to bring the velocity down to zero thus playing only the overtones, without the fundamental, I wasn't able to replicate that too on my trial version...Any idea of what's going on?Many thanks 2 Reply by brundlefly 27-02-2025 01:25 brundlefly Member Offline Registered: 31-03-2022 Posts: 212 Re: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? Yes, Pianoteq produces the full complexity of resonances in a piano, including string, duplex string and case resonances, and not just octaves. I suspect what you were seeing was a demonstration of Pianoteq being used as resonance FX for another instrument in which case you would send the MIDI to both the main instrument and Pianoteq but pull the velocity curve down to zero so that Pianoteq resonates based the audio input from the main instrument and which dampers are raised (per the MIDI input) without its strings being directly hammered.I'm not sure right offhand whether the demo can be used as a resonance FX and I suspect you need at least Pianoteq Standard to get it, but all verisons should have the basic resonance response for all the internal sounds; you just don't have as much control over them in Stage. 3 Reply by vertumno 03-03-2025 14:48 vertumno Member Offline Registered: 20-02-2025 Posts: 2 Re: Are overtones different between Pianoteq versions? brundlefly wrote:Yes, Pianoteq produces the full complexity of resonances in a piano, including string, duplex string and case resonances, and not just octaves. I suspect what you were seeing was a demonstration of Pianoteq being
2025-03-30About Pianoteq for Mac Pianoteq for Mac is an award-winning virtual instrument that you can install on your computer (PC/Mac). It can be used both in standalone mode and as an instrument plug-in in VST, AAX, and AudioUnits hosts.What makes the app superior to other virtual instruments is that the instruments are physically modeled and thus can simulate the playability and complex behavior of real acoustic instruments. By omitting the usage of samples, the file size is just a tiny fraction of that offered by other virtual instruments, perfect for use on any modern laptop.Version 6 of the app brings numerous refinements in its engine and physical model, increasing realism and acoustic presence on all its instruments: acoustic pianos, electro-acoustic pianos, histor... Read More » Why choose FileHorse?SecureSecurely download files from our super-fast and secure dedicated linux serversSafeThis product is 100% safe has been successfully scanned with more than 60 antivirus programsTrustedWe serve all files as they were released. We do not use bundlers or download-managers
2025-03-30Be permitted, that if Garritan CFX Lite is like silk, and the FP-30 is like cotton, then Pianoteq is like sawdust.In its defence, I am battling an annoying case of sinusitis right now, so maybe this has in some way affected my sense of sound. i certainly don't remember Pianoteq sounding offending before.Physical instruments: Roland FP-30, and E-28Virtual instruments: "The Experience" piano collection, NI "The Maverick", Galaxy II Grand piano collection, Synthogy Ivory II Studio Grands, Production Voices Estate Grand, Garritan CFX Lite, Pianoteq 7.5.2Focus: 1850±100 yearsJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,43910K Post Club Member10K Post Club MemberJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,439If your sinusitis somehow causes Pianoteq to sound like sawdust, why would it allow the Garritan to sound like silk?It seems to me that it's not the sinusitis. Rather, the Garritan is showing your ears what a piano sounds like, and you've become blissfully accustomed to that.Joined: May 2018Posts: 1,9671000 Post Club Member1000 Post Club MemberJoined: May 2018Posts: 1,967If your sinusitis somehow causes Pianoteq to sound like sawdust, why would it allow the Garritan to sound like silk?It seems to me that it's not the sinusitis. Rather, the Garritan is showing your ears what a piano sounds like, and you've become blissfully accustomed to that.In fairness, I have not listened to the Garritan since the sinusitis began. But that is probably besides the point, the more surprising discovery is prefering the Roland's own Steinway sample over all the Pianoteq instruments.My gut tells me that Pianoteq's reverb is central to its shortcomings (although not the only cause for the harshness).Physical instruments: Roland FP-30, and E-28Virtual instruments: "The Experience" piano collection, NI "The Maverick", Galaxy II Grand piano collection, Synthogy Ivory II Studio Grands, Production Voices Estate Grand, Garritan CFX Lite, Pianoteq 7.5.2Focus: 1850±100 yearsJoined: Sep 2009Posts: 14,43910K Post Club Member10K Post Club MemberJoined:
2025-03-30You from getting the NV10S.Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478I will admit, I never use Pianoteq, but I have no problem with the sound. It just not what I am looking for.It is a digitize sound and in my view not meant to sound like a real piano.If that is the type of sound you enjoy, it is very well done.The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.People seem quick to bash Pianoteq like it was a virus that needs to be squashed.Both types of sound can co-exist.RonKawai CA79VSL (BÖSENDORFER 280VC, CFX, Steinway D-274), Modern U, Ravenscroft275, Noire, Lounge Lizard EP-4(Not Used much) Garritan Abbey Road Studios CFX, Bechstein Digital, , Auddict_Dorian_Marko, The Grandeur,, 300_Grand_Compact, Pianoteq, Synthology_American_DJoined: Jun 2013Posts: 5,7515000 Post Club Member5000 Post Club MemberJoined: Jun 2013Posts: 5,751The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.Surely, this is in your humble opinion; for you see, I have a different yet humble opinion on “The Rolands;” and one could argue that my humble opinion is more-widely held than your “lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.”Joined: Feb 2021Posts: 478Full MemberFull MemberJoined: Feb 2021Posts: 478The Rolands I tried a couple of years ago sounded very much like Pianoteq and lots of people enjoy the Roland sound.Surely, this is in your humble opinion; for you see, I have a different yet humble
2025-04-01